On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:17:30 -0500, Kenneth Anderson <[log in to unmask]>  
wrote:
>
> I remember being unsupported by virtually everyone on this list when I
> suggested that acid/alkaline balance was necessary for good health (as
> the dreaded Cordian suggested), which seemed to go against the no-carb
> approach of the site.  Now it is discussed by William without
> objection.  Either this means William has powers I did not have to
> avoid criticism, or an actual change of position by the group.  Which
> is it?

You overlooked a third possibility -- that some of us realize that certain  
arguments are just a waste of energy, so we decide not to engage.  :)


-- 
   Robert Kesterson
   [log in to unmask]