Not really.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: programming cable for the HTX420
> Are you sure that won't work?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Angelo Sonnesso" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 9:27 AM
> Subject: programming cable for the HTX420
>
>
>>I figured I better change the subject field.
>> Any ideas where I can get a programming cable?
>> I have an Alinco cable, but it is a single pin cable.
>> It is brand new if anyone needs one, I will give it to you.
>> Angelo Sonnesso N2DYN
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Buddy Brannan" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>
>>
>>> LOL, I heard it was Maxon that made them for the Shaft, although they =
>>> used icon O2AT accessories. I don't think it was Standard, although =
>>> rumor was that the dual band they had for a short time was Standard, =
>>> although it was most likely ADI. Remember ADI?
>>> --
>>> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
>>> Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Anthony Vece wrote:
>>>
>>>> They were Standard radios.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Sent from my Verizon iPhone!
>>>>=20
>>>> On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:42 AM, John Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> No, the HTX-420, and that series of radios, I forget who made them =
>>> but it=3D20=3D
>>>>=20
>>>>> wasn't Icom, I believe GRE actually made them for radioshack.
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>>> From: "Angelo Sonnesso" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 10:23 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>> =3D20
>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>> Hay John,
>>>>>> Do you think the HTX420 is a re branded Icom?
>>>>>> The HTX420 is a dual band handheld.
>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 8:07 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>> radioshack was the brand but it was actually a rebranded icom =
>>> IC-02AT fo=3D
>>>> r
>>>>>>> the most part.
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>>>>> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:44 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>> I am wondering about the brand?
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>>>>>> From: "PATRICK GORMLEY" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:08 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>>> Jerry an htx202 is a 2-meter handi talkie. It just covers the =
>>> two=3D20
>>>>>>>>> meter
>>>>>>>>> band and can't receive anything above the band such as noaa =
>>> weather=3D20=3D
>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> htx212 mobile rig can.
>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>>>>>>> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:29 PM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>>>> what is an HTX202?
>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>>>>>>>> From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:43 PM
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>>>>> I had one of those as well and while it was an ok radio I =
>>> preferred m=3D
>>>> y
>>>>>>>>>>> Alinco dual banders over the htx202 they were more compatable =
>>> with=3D20=3D
>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> lo=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>>> cal
>>>>>>>>>>> repeaters that were in the area I was living in at that time =
>>> and fit=3D
>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> t=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>>> he
>>>>>>>>>>> hand better as well =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> -------Original Message-------=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> From: John Miller=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 2/1/2012 8:12:05 PM=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> Personally I think the HTX-202 was much better in quality and =
>>> sound.=3D
>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>> w=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>>> as=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> a little big, but I'd doubt if anything out of china will last =
>>> as=3D20=3D
>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> long
>>>>>>>>>>> as=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> they did.=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:41 PM=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> yeh, I guess if you like boat anchors, and antiquated =
>>> technology
>>>>>>>>>>>> the=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> htx202=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> is great...i've got a 38 dollar chinese dual band handheld =
>>> that wil=3D
>>>> l
>>>>>>>>>>>> pu=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>>> t=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> it=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> to shame though lol.=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> 73=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> Colin, V A6BS=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:11 PM=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: John Millers htx 202=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi John,=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just trying to get caught up on blind-hams archives.=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A year ago, you mentioned you had the htx 202, you still =
>>> have=3D20
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it?=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I doubt you do, because, well, what a great ht, and there is =
>>> a hig=3D
>>>> h
>>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D3D=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>>> demand for those!=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had one and loved it!=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 73,=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trippy, ac8s
>>>>>>>>>> =3D20
|
