BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerry Leary <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 05:44:58 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
I am wondering about the brand?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "PATRICK GORMLEY" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202


> Jerry an htx202 is a 2-meter handi talkie.  It just covers the two meter
> band and can't receive anything above the band such as noaa weather like 
> the
> htx212 mobile rig can.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:29 PM
> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>
>
>> what is an HTX202?
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>
>>
>>>I had one of those as well and while it was an ok radio I preferred my
>>> Alinco dual banders over the htx202 they were more compatable with the
>>> lo=
>>> cal
>>> repeaters that were in the area I was living in at that time and fit in
>>> t=
>>> he
>>> hand better as well =0D
>>> =0D
>>> =0D
>>> =0D
>>> =0D
>>> -------Original Message-------=0D
>>> =0D
>>> From: John Miller=0D
>>> Date: 2/1/2012 8:12:05 PM=0D
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=0D
>>> =0D
>>> Personally I think the HTX-202 was much better in quality and sound. It
>>> w=
>>> as=0D
>>> a little big, but I'd doubt if anything out of china will last as long
>>> as=
>>> =0D
>>> they did.=0D
>>> ----- Original Message -----=0D
>>> From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:41 PM=0D
>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=0D
>>> =0D
>>> =0D
>>>> yeh, I guess if you like boat anchors, and antiquated technology the=0D
>>>> htx202=0D
>>>> is great...i've got a 38 dollar chinese dual band handheld that will 
>>>> pu=
>>> t=0D
>>>> it=0D
>>>> to shame though lol.=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>> 73=0D
>>>> Colin, V A6BS=0D
>>>> ----- Original Message -----=0D
>>>> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:11 PM=0D
>>>> Subject: John Millers htx 202=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>>=0D
>>>>> Hi John,=0D
>>>>> Just trying to get caught up on blind-hams archives.=0D
>>>>> A year ago, you mentioned you had the htx 202, you still have it?=0D
>>>>> I doubt you do, because, well, what a great ht, and there is a high
>>>>> =3D=
>>> =0D
>>>>> demand for those!=0D
>>>>> I had one and loved it!=0D
>>>>> 73,=0D
>>>>> Trippy, ac8s
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2