BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 1 Jan 2012 17:09:16 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
    Well, thanks, Mike.

I guess like anything, readings with these devices are relative.

The power meter in the TS590 seems much more consistent and stable, so I 
will continue to use that one, and the TW1 as a rough way to double-check 
things if needed.

Prior to my having the TS590, I had to rely on the TW1, and at least it got 
me through to this point, without letting the smoke out of anything, so I am 
thankful to have had it.

Maybe someday, if I can get my hands on one of those RF Applications units, 
I'll give that one  a try too.

73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Cozzolino" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2012 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: More power output readings--now doubting accuracy of LDG TW1


> hello tom, do not pay any attention to the ldg pw1, it is a very in
> accurate device.  its readings are frequency dependent and even
> though they say that it will handle a kw on 50mhz thats not true.  i
> purchased a pw1 and compared it to my byrd 43 wattmeter and it was a
> joke.  and on 50mhz i ran a kw through it and in a flash it went up
> in smoke.  i spoke to ldg and was told that the unit will not handle
> a kw on 50mhz  even though they claim that it will.  i think that
> most folks on the list are using a pw1 and put way to much faith in
> its readings.  it is just a relative device and a very poor one at
> best.  the rf applications unit was a much more accurate device and
> was not so frequency conscious.  take care, c u 73 mike w6quv
>
>
>
> At 11:45 AM 1/1/2012, you wrote:
>>Hi, folks.
>>
>>I know, I know, it's just the professor in me, but this output power issue
>>I've been dealing with is intellectually interesting, if nothing else.  I
>>fully realize that 20 watts either way isn't going to make a difference in
>>terms of who hears me, how well they hear me, etc., but I have to report 
>>on
>>my latest set of output power readings this morning.
>>
>>First of all, When I use my Astron RS35 power supply, and take output 
>>power
>>readings with the watt meter on the TS590, things now seem to be pretty
>>stable at 100 watts output on either a resonant frequency for one of my
>>antennas, or when using the TS590 auto-tuner.  Obviously, the resonant
>>frequency readings are going to be the  most revealing, so those are the
>>ones I have the most faith in.
>>
>>What I still don't understand is why my LDG TW1 seems to be about 20 watts
>>off with its output power readings.  For now, I'm going to go with the
>>readings the radio gives me, since the rig is what needs to be kept happy.
>>
>>Between Mike Duke  and Steve Forst, I do have some good instructions if I
>>ever want to tweak the output voltage on the Astron RS35, but I think I'll
>>hold off on doing that for a while until I see if things remain as stable 
>>as
>>they are right now.
>>
>>Thanks to all for your your continued interest in, and help with this 
>>issue.
>>
>>73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2