BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Brennan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 31 Dec 2011 07:18:22 -0600
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (38 lines)
Guess I need to get mine looked at, then, cause its putting out 50w on 2m and
35w on 70cm.  Sure thought that's what the namual said to expect.

Tom


Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html

On Fri, 30 Dec 2011, Michael Thurman wrote:

> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:00:05 -0500
> From: Michael Thurman <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: ts2000 on hf?
>
> you wil not have a problem getting a proper diplexer, or even triplexer =
> for that matter, most of the good ones give you choices when you oder it =
> as to connector type, and the N connector for uhf has been pretty much =
> standard for high end radios for over a decade. also the ts2000 puts out =
> 100 w on 2 meters, not 50
>
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Tom Brennan wrote:
>
> > Yeah, that's an option.  I didn't use it because of the additional =
> loss it
> > introduced.  Since that radio only puts out 50w or less in the upper =
> bands I
> > figured I needed all the help I could get <g>.
> >=20
> > Tom
> >=20
> >=20
> > Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> > web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2