Hi Junior,
Do you ever get on echo link? If so, could we set up some kind of a schedule
say once or twice a week for now?
Carolyn Khj4vt
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Junior Lolley" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 8:34 PM
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: 20-meter net frequency.
> David, everyone has one of those days.
>
>
> Junior Lolley KG4itd
> Liberty County Emergency Coordinator
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of David Simpson
> Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 8:24 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 20-meter net frequency.
>
> Thanks, Junior. Guess I was lysdexic about it. Hi! I'll miss next weekend,
> but will try for the one after that.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Junior Lolley
> Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 5:02 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 20-meter net frequency.
>
> David, the 20 meter net freq is 14.258 at 4:00 p. m. EDT.
> The 40 meter freq is 7.185 at 4:00 p. m. EDT.
>
>
> Junior Lolley KG4itd
> Liberty County Emergency Coordinator
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of David Simpson
> Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 4:11 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: 20-meter net frequency.
>
> Is the net meeting today? Is it 14,285?
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Butch Bussen
> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 9:07 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Coax recommendations.
>
> Well for the number of feet you're running, rg 8 would work or rg213
> which is a good rg8 would be fine. 9913 is bwetter of course ass is
> lmr400, but a good rg8 would work fine. I don't know where to get it
> these days. I think someone posted an ebay listing for a good quality
> cable within the last couple days. Do not use rg 58 or rg 8x, to much
> loss at those frequencies.
> 73
> Butch
> WA0VJR
> Node 3148
> Wallace, ks.
>
>
> dOn Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Gerry Leary wrote:
>
>> How about some old zip cord that has been sitting in the sun for 30
>> years?
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Simpson" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 11:50 AM
>> Subject: Coax recommendations.
>>
>>
>>> Hi, Everyone.
>>> A friend in my radio club is willing to lend me a Discone antenna
>>> for 144, 220, and 440 mhz. He is also willing to help me mount it on the
>>> roof of my house. I'm wondring if anyone can recommend the best kind of
>>> coax
>>> for low line loss that is also water-proofed. I figure I'll need
> somewhere
>>> between 30 and 50 feet of it. Also, does anyone have a sugggestion for
> the
>>> best place to get a good price on it.
>>>
>>> Thanks much and 73,
>>>
>>> Dave W I 3 Y
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>> On Behalf Of Dave Marthouse
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 2:08 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: Notes On Accessible Satellite Tracking
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> It's interesting to note that two of the top programs for sat tracking
>>> under
>>> dos were fully speech-friendly. QuikTrak was my favorite but I in
>>> addition
>>> was able to use Instanttrack as well.
>>>
>>> I was quite active on the high orbit birds. AO-10 and AO13 were fun and
>>> interesting satellites.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave Marthouse N2AAM
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
|
