BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: This will prove I have too much time on my hands, but an interesting thing happens tomorrow.
From:
Kevin Minor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:50:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
Hi.

Your figuring the day a date is on almost works.  There's the thing about
leap years not being in years that divide by 100, but there's a leap year in
years divided by 400.  So 1600 had a leap year, 1700, 1800 and 1900 did not,
2000 did.

There were programmers who were concerned about this fact in 2000.

Just something more to think about.

Kevin

ATOM RSS1 RSS2