BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Barbara Lombardi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:30:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (136 lines)
Its no good. They use thumbnails etc and of course can'tr zoom in on the
page etc.  Its totally useless for us.  

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Patrick Tice
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Inaccessible Reader Medium for Ham Radio Publications

Justin and the list,

Here is a link to a current Worldradio article for testing:
http://www.zinio.com/pages/WorldRadioOnline/Dec-11/416199934/pg-68

I only get the print version of CQ, so I can't send a link to that one. 

73,
Pat


Regards,

Patrick Tice
[log in to unmask] 





-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Justin Mann
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 5:23 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Inaccessible Reader Medium for Ham Radio Publications

Pat,
've had god luck reading zinio magazines from my iPhone.  I'd be curious
trying to test "World Radio" and "Cq"  Can you send a link to both?  
Thanks

On Dec 16, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Patrick Tice wrote:

> Greetings, Listers!
> 
> I've been away from the list for a while, mostly depending on the list 
> archives to help me answer questions Handiham members ask me.  Now I'm 
> = back again because I want to bring forward a troubling new 
> development. We = all know that we are on the cusp of a major change 
> in the publishing world.
> While digital publication can greatly enhance accessibility to blind 
> computer users, we cannot necessarily assume that new publishing 
> formats will necessarily be compliant with accepted accessibility 
> standards.  To illustrate this, I am pasting the following message 
> that I received from = the Zinio Support folks, then I will fill you 
> in a bit more.  Here is the e-mail:=20
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Thank you for contacting Zinio Customer Support.=20
> 
> Unfortunately Zinio publications are not compatible with screen 
> readers, = we apologize for the inconvenience.
> 
> If I can be of further assistance, please let me know.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Eric Folsom
> Zinio Customer Support
> 
> Okay, this is pretty much what I suspected because I was unable to = 
> highlight any text in the Zinio Reader, and the browser-based version 
> gave similar results.  However, the publications Zinio supports are 
> searchable for keywords, so there must be some sort of embedded text 
> underlying the graphical text presentation.  I am by no means a 
> screenreader user = myself since I can see the pages, but NVDA hadn't 
> a clue as to the main body = text in any of the pages when tested with 
> Worldradio Online Magazine, which = does use the Zinio system along 
> with CQ and many other magazines.  The Zinio Reader does include easy 
> to use font resizing, but the lack of = screenreader support is 
> troubling. =20
> 
> As I said, we are going to find more and more publications on line in 
> = the coming years, most sooner rather than later.  In the January
> 2012 QST = there is a mention of the anticipated mid-year rollout of a 
> digital version of QST.  I want to emphasize that I have no 
> information on which publishing platform ARRL will be using and 
> whether it will be screenreader = accessible, but it is painfully 
> apparent that inaccessible design can be carried = forward into the 
> new publishing medium.  This is shown clearly in the step = backwards 
> from Worldradio Online in PDF with embedded text several issues ago = 
> prior to the change to the Zinio Reader versus the current "apologize 
> for the inconvenience" situation we have now.  =20
> 
> I don't fault the Worldradio Online people for this - they are simply 
> = using an on line publishing company.  And in fair disclosure, I do 
> write the = "With the Handihams" column that appears regularly in WR.
> But I think that = any company that delivers online media, especially 
> digital print = publications for heaven's sake, should be able to 
> provide screenreader access.=20
> 
> Can we start a civil discussion about this, and put together some kind 
> = of informational message and action plan about what should be 
> expected regarding accessibility?  I know that the ADA does not 
> necessarily = require accessibility, but we all know that it is the 
> right thing to do, and = that it is also not a good business plan to 
> exclude potential readers.  =20
> 
> 73,
> Pat
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> Regards,=A0
> 
> Patrick Tice, M.A. | Manager, Courage Handiham System | PH: 
> 763.520.0511 =
> |
> Courage Center | 3915 Golden Valley Road | Golden Valley, MN 55422
> 
> [log in to unmask] | CourageCenter.org
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---=
> ---
> ---
> 
> This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
> and contains
> 
> confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized 
> disclosure, copy or distribution of this information is strictly 
> prohibited. If you = are not the intended recipient, please notify the 
> sender and delete this = e-mail.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2