Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 28 Aug 1998 22:05:20 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 8/27/98 4:36:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:
<< At 8/26/98 02:05 PM , David Gillett wrote:
> [Apparently, many
>266 MHz Celerons can be overclocked reliably to about 400 MHz or so,
>which may more than offset the no-caching penalty.]
I have a friend who says that he has a Celeron on a 112 MHz bus with 8 ns
memory and clocked at 400 MHz. Says he can hold his finger on the
processor chip it is so cool. He claims to have upgraded for about $ 300
total. I personally have not seen it yet.
Any other experimenters out there having similar success with souped up
Celerons? >>
Hi,
For more info on the Celeron's performance (especially the new one with the
onboard 128K cache), check out www.tomshardware.com (Hint: the new Celeron
with onboard cache keeps up with a P-II running at the same clock frequencies,
and is as overclocking friendly as the original Celeron. It also costs about
one third of what a P-II 400-450 costs.)
My .02 worth,
Peter Hogan
[log in to unmask]
-----
**Need help with PCBUILD mailing list? Send an Email to:**
Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]> or Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>
|
|
|