I'm not sure what your point is. Are you saying that existing laws 
shouldn't be enforced because they're subject to change down the road? 
Laws have to be enforced as they're written today, otherwise, it would 
be the same as not having any laws at all.

On 08/08/2013 08:33 PM, Mike Pietruk wrote:
> Andy
>
> I see where you are coming from.
>
> I wanted to comment on something that was mentioned earlier.  It is
> frequently cited that ADA is the law; and it is.
> However, just because something is the law today doesn't mean it will be
> in the future.
> Laws can and are amended, changed, overfuled or revoked by new legislation
> and court decisions.
> So you cannot rely on the notion that ADA is the law.
> And if the original intent of the law is usurped, greater is the chance
> for repeal.
>
>
> Applying God's standards to life's choices is called wisdom; applying the
> world's standards is called folly.
> Woodrow Kroll, in Proverbs: The Pursuit of God's Wisdom
>
>
>      VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
> Archived on the World Wide Web at
>      http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
>      Signoff: [log in to unmask]
>      Subscribe: [log in to unmask]
>

-- 
Christopher (CJ)
chaltain at Gmail


    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]