PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:19:45 -0400
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Keith Thomas <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Geoffrey Purcell wrote:
> 
>This appears to be just another baseless media-scare, like the mercury-in-fish hype. 

Baseless?

> I checked with a physicist on allexperts.com who pointed out that the Fukushima 
> radiation was far less than the levels found in Czernobyl, and the latter also turned 
> out to be a fraudulent scare.

Fraudulent?

Here's a report published on line today on the spread of radiation in the fortnight following the tsunami:

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Fukushima_Fallout_Rivals_Chernobyl.php

Keith

ATOM RSS1 RSS2