I do wish people wouldn't be so irrational as to suggest that the right diet could cure cancer. It is already well-known that wild animals on natural, evolutionarily-appropriate diets, still get cancer:- http://www.livescience.com/9680-cancer-kills-wild-animals.html http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2009/07/26/the-wild-s-creeping-killer.html http://www.treehugger.com/corporate-responsibility/cancers-threaten-wild-animal-populations.html http://planetgreen.discovery.com/food-health/human-pollution-cancer-animals.html Note, judging from the above scientific links, how "polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons", in this case primarily derived from pollution, which are also very heavily present in cooked animal foods via cooking, and therefore cooked zero-carb diets, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241432/ are strongly linked to the incidence of cancers. In other words, a cooked, palaeolithic diet will have negligible effect against cancers, only a raw, palaeolithic diet will have any. Geoff
