I'll try that again, but I cranked the carrier all the way up and didn't 
see any change from 25 where I had it set.  That is a good idea with the 
tone though.  I'll try that.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.


On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Kevin Nathan wrote:

> Hi Butch,
>
> Check your carrier level.  It will effect CW output.  What you can do with
> your TW1 is to put it into tuning aid mode and then advance the carrier to
> where you get no more increase in power output.  This should give you full
> power output.
>
> Take care and very 73.
>
>
>
> Kevin :)
> Amateur Radio:  K7RX
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Butch Bussen
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 21:36
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Fw: 590 question
>
> I just found another strange thing.  With my tw1 on cw and rtty, I only
> show 75 watts without the tuner into a dummy load and 68 with the tuner
> in line.  Switching to the 2000, nothing else changed, the tw1 shows 97
> watts.  I have the transmit power set to 100, I wonder if there is an
> internal adjustment.  Guess I'd better try my luck at getting on the 590
> list.
> 73
> Butch
> WA0VJR
> Node 3148
> Wallace, ks.
>
>
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Ed Malmgren wrote:
>
>> Butch, it is a real interesting radio and it is much smarter than I am but
>> wats new hi.  73
>> Ed   K7UC
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 9:03 PM
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: Fw: 590 question
>>
>>> I read the manual, but don't remember that.  It certainly is an
>>> interesting radio.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> 73
>>> Butch
>>> WA0VJR
>>> Node 3148
>>> Wallace, ks.
>>
>>
>
>