BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ron Yearns <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 18:00:29 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
I just reread this and noticed the phone tech said they cancelled each other 
out.  Well that is just plain false.  There would be no cancelling.
Ron
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pat Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: grounding question


> That sounds like an urban myth to me but perhaps he is
> correct.   There is a point of diminishing returns but generally the
> more rods, tied together and radials you can get in the ground the
> better off you will be.
> Pat, K9JAUAt 07:37 AM 1/7/2012, you wrote:
>>A grounding question for some of you more experienced hams.
>>I had a phone company tech tell me that if two ground rods were less than 
>>8
>>foot a part they canceled each other out.
>>And then wasn't really any good.
>>Is this correct?
>>And if so what is the proper distance for 2 ground rods to be a par?
>>I want to get the best ground possible for my tower and radio.
>>I just don't have that much experience in grounding.
>>I would appreciate any help on this.
>>
>>
>>Junior Lolley KG4itd
>>Liberty County Emergency Coordinator 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2