Are you thinking of CQ100?  My problem with that software is that you have 
to pay for the privilege of not being on the radio, so I choose not to use 
it.  On the other hand, go for it if it floats your boat.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 09:23
Subject: Re: back on the list again


> Not true at all.  I'm an "old ham", got my general in 1968 and have been
> using computers since 1983.  AT least when you use it, you're using an
> ht I wasn't going to post any more, but I am an old ham as mentioned
> abovve and enjoy merging the technologies.  What is the name of that
> program where you get on line and the screen even looks like a radio and
> you talk to other people using the same thing, and they call it radio
> even though it is nothing more than voice over ip.
>
> 73
> Butch
> WA0VJR
> Node 3148
> Wallace, ks.
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2011,
> KK4AHX Darren Duff wrote:
>
>> You wrote....
>> I'm not sure why some people talk about using Echolink as if it was an
>> insult to their manhood.  I thought the goal of amateur radio was
>> communication, not "my radio is more real than your radio."
>>
>> Amen Steve! Couldn't have said it better myself.  I think we have stirred
>> the pot so to speak with some older hams on this list that don't like
>> computers or just don't like change.  Anyway, until I can aford a good
>> mobile to use as a base here, I will stick to my Wouxun HT, and good old
>> Echolink!
>>
>>
>>
>> 73.
>>
>> Darren Duff.
>>
>> amateur radio station KK4AHX.
>>
>> Cherokee Amateur Radio Society.
>>
>> http://www.cherokeehams.com
>>
>>
>> _____________ NOD32 EMON 6349 (20110804) information _____________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>