BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Barbara Lombardi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:01:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
I still have my kenwood 870 and it works fine although my sister is teasing
me about getting the new 590 hi.  

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Keith Reedy
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 7:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: After some thought, we are keeping the 2000.

Hi folks,

What fun it is to have a new rig, but, not for this family, not at this =
time.

One of the reasons for buying the Kenwood 2000 some years ago was that = it
has 2 and 440 and an extra receiver.  As Skywarn coordinator for = eastern
IL and western IN I use 3 receivers in any given weather event = so as well
as the 590 we would need to buy a dual band rig to replace = the 2000s high
end.  It still does a good Job on HF and the thing I like = best is that it
is paid for, grin.

I may have a new rig at some point, but, as for now, its the good old = 2000
for me.

I said for this family, My wife Suzie and 6 of our 8 kids are hams.
73 Keith-wa9dro
Keith Reedy
Click the link below to download MP3's of Keith Reedy's music as a gift =
from Bibles For The Blind.

http://biblesfortheblind.org/download_music.shtml

God gives His best to those who leave the choice with Him.  J Hudson =
Taylor.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2