If I said that I didn't mean to. I meant to say 147.000. But like you, I
have encountered a 147.0600 repeater that had a negative offset.
Harvey
----- Original Message -----
From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: Repeater Offsets on 2 Meters
> is the cut off 147, or 147.07?
> I ask because every repeater I've seen with a frequency of 147.06 has a
> negative offset. But many argue that this is an artifact of older
> equipment.
> I always thought the cut off was 147 too, but harvey said 147.07, which
> actually makes more sence.
> 73
> Colin,