Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:34:29 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree.
how does some minimum wage kid at radio shack know what is accessible and
better for someone without sight?
even a thinking, half way intelligent person wouldn't necesarily know what
is more accessible.
perhaps he thought because the buttons are slightly bigger on the table top
model that it would be physically easier...if your not blind, or around a
blind person all the time, you really have no clue what the word
"accessibility" or "accessible" means.
you probably had to explain what a scanner was and what you were looking for
in the first place...red flag right there.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Brennan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: i just spoke to radio shack about radio scanners
> This sounds like crap. First, if you're going to spend the money you'd do
> better to go somewhere else than rat shack. Second, the only things
> "easier"
> about table models is that they stay put a little better and they
> sometimes have
> bigger buttons. Programming and actual accessibility are the same for
> either.
>
> Tom
>
>
> Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
|
|
|