BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:50:16 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<82.78.03291.CDBB1CE4@louvi-msg>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
Tom,

Glad you got it going.   You are going to find most of the  good stuff 
on 160 is below 1.850.   Of course there are exceptions, and during 
contests things will go higher, but  you will usually find DX at the low 
  part of the band. Your 1.830 is a good place to be.

  Nice to see you worked W8JI.  He has a monster station on 160.   Some 
kind of phased verticals or something.    He worked for Ameritron before 
it was MFJ, and  I think designed some of the amps that are still in 
production today.   Think he also had something to do with the current 
Ameritron/MFJ solid state amps.

  I think you know my friend Paul N4PN from Macon.  He sometimes 
operates 160  contests from W8JI to use those monster antennas.

If you would like an education on some stuff, check out his web site at:
w8ji.com

73, Steve KW3A

On 11/14/2011 8:09 PM, Tom Behler wrote:
>      Not yet. ... He has had some recent medical problems that have prevented
> that from happening.
>
> Did have my first QSO on 160 last night though.  It was at the bottom of the
> band on 18.30 MHZ with W8JI from Georgia.
>
> He gave me a 599, and said I had a great CW signal, so I think I'm making
> progress.
>
> The SWR's at the top of 160 are still around 10.1 to 1, but oddly enough,
> the auto tuner in the TS590 tunes the antenna, even at the top of the band.
> Why, I'm not sure.
>
> My lowest SWR reading is about 2 to 1 around 18.30 MHZ.  I am still not
> quite sure where the point of resonance is, but I would think it's in there
> somewhere.  I may put the analyzer on the antenna again, although as we have
> discussed before, it seems pretty much useless on 160 meters because of the
> nearby local A M broadcast station.
>
> So, in summary, the bottom line is that the 160 meter sloper now tunes
> throughout the band with the TS590, and I'm at least making some contacts.
>
> I think there is some tweaking to do, and I won't feel totally comfortable
> until I find out exactly where the antenna is truly resonating, and whether
> my measured SWR readings are really accurate.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gerry Leary"<[log in to unmask]>
> To:<[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 7:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Need helping making sense out of contradictory SWR readings
>
>
>> did The man who designed them come to help you?
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2