BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:23:57 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<03.69.03291.0BA22AE4@louvi-msg>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
Tom,

Like  most of the multitude, I wouldn't worry about it.  I've never been 
a fan of coax seal. It is a real mess when the time comes to undo it.

The 3M tape you used is good stuff.   I think the only difference 
between the Super 33 and Super 88 is the thickness, both are rated for 
outdoor use.    If your friend knows what he is doing, he should have 
wrapped the final layer up from the bottom, towards the top.   This 
makes the final layer lay like shingles on a roof and  water won't try 
and  work it's way under each tape  seam, like would happen if the last 
layer were done from top down.   Either way, 3 layers of good quality 
tape is going to be fine.

Here are a few things in the "should of" department:    Some time  ago 
there was a discussion of butyl rubber sheets for sealing coax outdoors. 
   Also some discussion of using pulleys to allow you to raise and 
lower the antenna yourself.  Oh, well...

If your 160 antenna is up, there is a 160 CW contest tonight.Exchange is 
4 digit grid square and points are based on distance between grids.  Try 
it out and see if it works.

73, Steve KW3A

On 10/21/2011 10:30 PM, Tom Behler wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> Well, to make a very long story short, I have decided to take my troublesome
> Carolina Windom 160 compact antenna down, and am in the process of replacing
> it with a 160-meter sloper, and an 80-meter sloper that I purchased at a
> swap in my area last week-end.
>
> We are in the middle of the antenna replacement process, but I'm hoping it
> should be done by later tomorrow.
>
> All has gone well, except for one small issue, which I'm torn about how to
> deal with.  This is the kind of issue where we've all been there when trying
> to deal with volunteer help who doesn't do things like we would.
>
> Anyway, my friend installed the 160-meter sloper at the top of my 40-foot
> mast, but when I asked him how he sealed the coax connection at the feed
> point, he said that he coated the connector with a dialectric grease, and
> then tightly wrapped three layers of electrical tape around the connection.
> The tape he used was some real good 3 M tape that I had gotten a while ago.
> I had wanted him to put coax seal on top of the tape, but he would not do
> it, arguing that what he did should be fine.
>
> Obviously, my concern is that the electrical tape eventually will
> deteriorate, and let water into the connection.
>
> I'm trying to figure out a tactful way to bring up this issue again with him
> when he comes back tomorrow, but, at the same time, I don't want to offend
> him, since he has done so much for me already.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas as to how to tactfully handle the situation?
> Obviously, if just having the electrical tape was good enough, I wouldn't
> stress about it, but I would sure hate to be introducing unnecessary
> problems into the situation here.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2