Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:10:26 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<826376C6F66343EC9FA46DB47AC403FA@lras05> |
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<B5.EA.03315.9DCBC4E4@louvi-msg> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Even on this list, a couple of people have found some anomaly and had to
reset the TS590 to restore normal operation. Not too surprising. I am
happy with my Yaesu FT950, but think that the TS590 should be a good way to
go for a new rig with excellent performance and accessibility.
Lloyd Rasmussen, Kensington, Maryland
Home: http://lras.home.sprynet.com
Work: http://www.loc.gov/nls
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Curtis Delzer
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 3:19 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Kenwood ts590? compared? to
>
> I got a confusing message, at least to me, from my friend about the=20
> 590. Seems that a good friend of ours told him that the 590 has been=20
> having problems that the, and I quote him "Yahoo 590," though I am=20
> pretty sure he means Yaesu 590, is better? or more dependable?
> Can anyone on this list shed some light on the potential source of=20
> his concerns about problems with the 590s and the meaning of "yahoo 590,"=
> :)
>
> confusing me! :) we almost settled on the 590 as the one I should=20
> get, when this anomaly came up. where ever it is from. :)
>
>
>
> --
> Currently in Fessenden, North Dakota Mostly Cloudy, Thunder;=20
> Lightning Observed 66=B0F Wind:SSW-200=B0 at 9mph
> Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
>
> Curtis Delzer
> W B 6 H E F
|
|
|