BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:17:20 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<79CDA259312845FF85DC600901711C50@JohnPC>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<42.FA.03315.9DCBC4E4@louvi-msg>
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
there is no yaesu 590 yet though they're causing a lot of confusion taking 
Kenwood model numbers and putting it on their garbage.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Curtis Delzer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 3:19 AM
Subject: Kenwood ts590? compared? to


>I got a confusing message, at least to me, from my friend about the=20
> 590. Seems that a good friend of ours told him that the 590 has been=20
> having problems that the, and I quote him "Yahoo 590," though I am=20
> pretty sure he means Yaesu 590, is better? or more dependable?
> Can anyone on this list shed some light on the potential source of=20
> his concerns about problems with the 590s and the meaning of "yahoo 590,"=
> :)
>
> confusing me! :) we almost settled on the 590 as the one I should=20
> get, when this anomaly came up. where ever it is from. :)
>
>
>
> --
> Currently in Fessenden, North Dakota Mostly Cloudy, Thunder;=20
> Lightning Observed 66=B0F Wind:SSW-200=B0 at 9mph
> Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
>
> Curtis Delzer
> W B 6 H E F 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2