BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Sat, 6 Aug 2011 13:29:21 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: The value of VOIP communication: was RE: back on the list again
From:
Buddy Brannan <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<20.4F.03315.2BEFC3E4@louvi-msg>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
Ehh. Give me asterisk/allstar over both of 'em. :-)
--
Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY



On Aug 6, 2011, at 4:43 AM, Dave Marthouse wrote:

> I must say that I am not a big fan of EchoLink audio.  To me it has a bit of
> a raspy quality.  In terms of voip for the ham bands give me IRLP over
> EchoLink.
> 
> Dave Marthouse N2AAM
> [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2