 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 23 May 2011 09:47:35 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<2C91DDDA298C409EAD591966780A29C2@LouKolbLaptop> |
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
<66.D0.03326.E826ADD4@louvi-msg> |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Nice Job, Gary. If they hear from enough of us, they'll take it seriously.
We can't let them forget we're out here. lou
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Lee" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:35 AM
Subject: message sent to elecraft concerning the k3 and kx3
>I sent the following message to Wayne Burdick just a little bit ago.
>
> I must say, I have been disappointed in elecraft's provision of access for
> the k3.
> However, maybe this will bare some fruit.
>
> Sir:
> Would you please add cw feedback like the kx1 to the kx3? If so, I'll
> buy.
> Also, since it is pretty clear that there will be no independent
> non-computer access to the k3, would it be possible to do a similar thing
> with the krc2 that was done with the k2?
> That seems a legitimate compromize to me.
|
|
|
