BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:11:21 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<78BC97B8E20F4F618214BACBC05A95B0@LouKolbLaptop>
Subject:
Re: bitter disappointment!
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<FC.C9.04390.277033D4@louvi-msg>
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
From:
Lou Kolb <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
I have a 3 here.  It's ok but from what I understand, the 2 was the one to 
have.  The Secrane radios seem  to perform well but I doubt they sound as 
good as the super radios since they don't have that big case and speaker. 
Lou
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!


>    Wow, that is really troubling!
>
> Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 8:29 PM
> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>
>
> It looks the same, but far worse than the GE 3.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2