BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date:
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:24:23 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
bitter disappointment
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Patrick Gormley <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines) 
I agree with Tom and John regarding the super radio III.  Now that I'm out 
in the country, I wish I still had my original super radio because that one 
along with the Panasonic rf2100 was a hot receiver.  The drawback with that 
rig was the fragility of that dial cord.  I don't know what would be the 
equivalent now.  The sdr radio ides sounds good but I don't think any of the 
software packages are all that speech friendly.  73- pat kk3f

ATOM RSS1 RSS2