BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Keith Reedy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:35:31 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Hi Ron,

1005 is the number.

73 Keith-wa9dro
Keith Reedy
Click the link below to download MP3's of Keith Reedy's music as a gift from Bibles For The Blind.

http://biblesfortheblind.org/download_music.shtml

God gives His best to those who leave the choice with Him.  J Hudson Taylor.




On Apr 7, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Ron Yearns wrote:

> For some reason I remember reading, listening , to a few months old QST 
> where they were saying the 468 didn't hold in all cases.  I also took 80 
> meters times 39 and then divided by 12 and got within decimal points of the 
> same numbers.  I know 39 inches isn't exactly the number of inches in a 
> meter but amazing how close it came out.
> Man using 1005 calls for 279 feet that's 19 feet longer than the other way. 
> Almost a ten percent difference.
> Maybe it's going to come down to cut and try with the antenna analyzer.
> Ron
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Walt Sebastian" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 4:16 PM
> Subject: Re: antenna lengths
> 
> 
>> Hi Ron,
>> For some reason or another the formula for the loop is 1005 divided by
>> frequency.  I hope this helps.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Walt
>> WA4QXT
>> Groton CT
>> [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2