Tom,
I haven't had good luck with verticals on 75, and I think there are two
reasons why: First, my radials weren't nearly long enough, nor were there
enough of them to be effective. Second, verticals do better for long
distance work, and I was looking for shorter ranges. I've had much better
luck with dipoles on 75, so that's what I use. On the other hand, I've
heard of lots of people having success with quarter wave verticals on 160,
but again, you have to be willing to put down lots of radials.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 06:59
Subject: Re: Getting Off Of The Blind Hams List?
> Steve:
>
> Well, thanks for the correction, and the very good information.
>
> If I can't get my dipoles to work better here, I may actually consider one
> of them as well, although I am not sure it will be helpful for the NVIS
> work
> I'd like to do, especially on 75, 80, and 160 meters.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 11:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Getting Off Of The Blind Hams List?
>
>
> Tom and Chris,
>
> Unlike many other verticals, the Titan doesn't require radials. That
> antenna is actually called a vertical dipole. I think that means that the
> antenna is center fed, as opposed to being fed from the base like most
> other
> verticals. In addition to not needing radials, the antenna is supposed to
> be quite flat over much of its coverage area. I'm interested in finding
> out
> more about the Gap antennas, so I'm looking forward to hearing any
> reports.
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 16:28
> Subject: Re: Getting Off Of The Blind Hams List?
>
>
>> Kris:
>>
>> I don't know a whole lot about the Gap Titan, and how it compares to the
>> hustler variety of verticals, so I'll defer to the others on the list
>> about
>> that.
>>
>> Any vertical, though, to perform well, will require a good set of
>> radials,
>> which I know you already have for your Hustler.
>>
>> Regarding 10 meters, there wasn't a whole lot of activity here in
>> Michigan
>> either--probably about 15 or 20 stations on at one time, but the band was
>> really up and down.
>>
>> So, it may or may not be your antenna.
>>
>> Anyway, let's see what the others think.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Kris Hickerson" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 10:10 AM
>> Subject: Re: Getting Off Of The Blind Hams List?
>>
>>
>> Tom,
>>
>> I don't know what was going on with 10 meters here yesterday, but I
>> didn't
>> hear anything.
>>
>> Speaking of antennas, I'm considering changing from the Hustler to a Gap
>> Titan in the spring. Do you have any thoughts on this? I do so poorly
>> on
>> 40 and 80 with the Hustler, and, apparently, on 10 as well. So I'd like
>> to
>> get something that will give me better coverage on all the bands if I
>> can.
>>
>> I'd love to have a tower with a beam, who wouldn't, but in the middle of
>> a
>> subdivision, I don't think that would go over too well.
>>
>> Concerning the issue of off topic stuff. I think we need to tolerate a
>> little of that. I don't want to be on 400 different lists, and sometimes
>> I
>> just have one question about something and all I need is one answer. We
>> havd a vast amout of knowledge between us all and we should be able to
>> share
>> that.
>>
>> 73
>> Kris
>>
>
|
