Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 27 Jun 1998 18:17:26 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'm not sure if this will apply in 98 but maybe someone can give it a try.
From 95B on, you can force the size of the clusters with the following switch;
/z:1 will give you 512K clusters (no matter how big the drive)
/z:2 will give you 1020K clusters
/z:4 will give you 2048K clusters
You get the idea, multiply by 512.
HTH
Jose
Don Cooley wrote:
> Patrick
>
> The figures below are interesting. If you have a 7GB hard drive you can use
> 4K clusters. If you use a 7GB up you can use 8K cluster. Now when you
> figure it out you will find that a 8GB drive with 8K clusters only gives you
> someplace in the vicinity of 7GB of useable space. May be better to use a
> 7GB drive or to format a 8GB drive to use 7 GB and make use of the 4K
> clusters. The larger the cluster size the more he waste space. Not exactly
> sure of the formula to figure the waste space but there are some shareware
> that does that.
>
................cut....................
> Ok, we've been debating about FAT 32 for months, here is what the Windows
> 98 Manual says about FAT 32, and the conversion prog., verbatim.
>
> ----Cut from Page 85 of the Microsoft Windows 98 manual (English)----
>
> The table below illustrates the larger partition size and smaller size
> available thought the FAT32 files system. partitions larger than 2
> gigabyte (GB) are not supported with FAT16, and paritions smaller than
> 512MB are not supported with FAT32.
>
> Partition size FAT16 cluster size FAT32
> cluster size
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------
> 32 MB(megabytes) 2 KB (kilobytes) --
>
> 128 MB 2 KB --
>
> 256 MB 4 KB --
>
> 512 MB 8 KB 4 KB
>
> 1 GB (gigabyte) 16 KB
> 4 KB
>
> 2 GB 32 KB 4 KB
>
> 3 GB - 7 GB -- 4 KB
>
> 8 GB - 16 GB -- 8 KB
>
> 16 GB - 32 GB -- 16 KB
>
> Larger than 32 GB --
> 32 KB
|
|
|