Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 22 May 2010 21:59:04 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Danny,
I haven't experienced their customer service yet but everyone I've talked to
who has has been blown away by them. I do have a few questions so may call
them Monday. But there's no question that they are aware of us, thanks to
folks like Gary, and they even posted a textual description of the front
panel on their web site. I have found that to be invaluable while learning
this thing. Lou
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Dyer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: new rig
> So good to hear a very good report on a US made rig by folks who
> apparently are truly trying for both quality and accessibility. I've
> never even had my hands on anything Elecraft makes, but I've
> sure______ heard excellent reports from everybody in my acquaintance
> who's operated anything made by them.Maybe some day I'll get my grubby
> lil mits on one of them. Danny.
>
> On 5/22/10, Lou Kolb <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Well, I've had the K3 for a few days now and all the hype turns out to be
>> accurate.. It's true, I'm not too familiar with today's digital signal
>> processing having used a ts440 for the past 21 years but this thing is
>> unbelievable. I've never used a better CW rig and I've barely scratched
>> the
>> surface of what it can do. With every QSO I'm more impressed.
>>
>> As for access, it's no kenwood 480 but it's certainly usable. It should
>> be
>> even better once I get K3-voice running but I'm having trouble getting
>> the
>> computer and K3 to talk with each other. I'm sure that'll be solved
>> soon.
>> In the meantime, I'll try to check into the net tomorrow and I'll keep
>> you
>> all posted on my progress. I'm hoping the non-hams in my life will
>> forgive
>> me for being a bit distracted lately. 73, Lou
>>
|
|
|