BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:45:31 -0400
Reply-To:
Message-ID:
<EF821DDF1DA54928B7BDACD6A768EB9F@lras05>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<86.16.03276.6217CBD4@louvi-msg>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Lloyd Rasmussen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I had an S5 line noise level, but that was enough to make you guys
practically uncopiable.  The disadvantage of having more sunspots is that we
can have more times of high absorption on the low bands and disturbed
conditions on the higher bands.  Propagation becomes more of a roler-coaster
ride.  Of course, this means less boring and less predictable, for good or
bad.
73,
Lloyd Rasmussen, W3IUU, Kensington, Maryland
Home:  http://lras.home.sprynet.com
Work:  http://www.loc.gov/nls
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Steve Forst
> Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 4:29 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Today's roundtable (sort of)
> 
> Conditions were   pretty bad today on 40 meters.  I chatted with Junior
> KG4ITD a bit and we were joined  by Art W5VMP from Indiana.  After 25
> minutes and no others joining us, we called it quits.
> 
> Better luck next week.
> 
> Steve KW3A

ATOM RSS1 RSS2