BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:45:57 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Least Expensive Way To Go HF
From:
Buddy Brannan <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<E4.40.03264.E5F2BBD4@louvi-msg>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines) 
Hi Eric,

You're right. The 120, 130, 520, 530, etc. etc are too old to have speech synthesizers, but who cares? At least in the case of the '520/820/830, there's a perfectly usable crystal callibrator, and you can for sure tell hwo far you've gone by counting dial revolutions. Pretty sure the same applies to the 120/130. These are of course all ham bands only radios, no WARC. 
--
Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY



On Apr 29, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Eric Clegg wrote:

> Hello,
> All of these are nice rigs but I don't believe there are any speech 
> synthesizer boards available for the erly Kenwoods.
> 
> If you can find a Kenwood TS50 I believe it will work with a Millenium Qsyer 
> with a slight modification to the rig.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Eric Clegg
> KU3I
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6082 (20110429) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2