Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:19:27 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'll give you that their software is probably more accessible, but, for my
money, that's not accessibility.
I guess I'm getting old and cranky, but, if I'm putting out big dollars for
a device, any device, I want to be able to use that device as would any
other person.
At least, with the 590, for a modest fee, I have nearly full access to the
rig in whatever siguation I need to use it in.
I've given up on tentec, because they could at least have added some beeps,
cw output, and used a detented control at little or no extra cost.
I have suggest these very ideas to them multiple times with no response.
73
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Gormley" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 3:49 PM
Subject: tentec not like Yaesu
> Gary I don't think Tentec is nearly as bad as Yaesu since the Icom
> software
> is a lot more accessible than the Yaesu software is. There is a problem
> in
> that you have to have a computer to drive the rig which poses some
> problems
> when you're out in the field since that's not always available. I'm glad
> you have the 590 but it'll be quite sometime before I can afford to buy
> some
> more toys. 73- pat kk3f
|
|
|