BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Date:
Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:57:30 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Pat Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<77.E2.23198.6B90A8C4@louvi-msg>
Message-ID:
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
I would think that the board would work, coupled in to the proper 
point in the 440.  As Howard said "67 hertz is 67 hertz,", but 
finding the person with the ability to do the job might be the trick.
Pat, K9JAUAt 05:34 AM 9/10/2010, you wrote:
>Really?
>Isn't 67Hz 67Hz no matter how it's generated?  Maybe their is an output
>level difference?
>Enquiring minds want to know.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2