BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:57:36 -0400
Reply-To:
Gary Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: T S 2000
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Gary Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
I had a 2000, acessibility is among the top 5.  However, my biggest problem 
was selectivity, and vhf sensativity.

The hf selectivity can be helped by replacing the roofing filter with an 
inrad unit.  This job requires soldering.

However, I am somewhat spoiled from owning a k2 and k3.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 2:44 PM
Subject: T S 2000


>I was wondering how satisfied owners are with this rig along side of others
> they have used?  Selectivity, sensitivity and such,   I hear the
> accessibility is good.
> I have a 480 so am somewhat familiar with this particular  rig.  Thanks 
> and
> 73.  Ed  K7UC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2