BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:02:13 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<9EC4EFD26D6041DDB78A68592BC82BF0@JohnMillerPC>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<D5.77.04438.4F8656C4@louvi-msg>
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
I've used an amp with 811 tubes with no problem. My recommendation though is 
swap the 811 tubes with 572B's which run cooler but I can't complain about 
them I don't know why they'd be any harder or easier than anything else.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fred Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 11:46 AM
Subject: Tube amplifiers


> Are any of you guys using or have you used an amplifier with 811 tubes?  I
> have heard some blind hams say that amplifiers with 811 tubes are not very
> easy to tune, what do you think?  I was thinking of getting one or a 
> single
> 3-500 tube amplifier.  I would appreciate your comments.  I purchased a 
> new
> Ameritron AL80B several years ago and didn't like it so I swapped it off.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
> FRED ADAMS W4HC
> LETS ALL REMEMBER
> VOTE IN NOVEMBER 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2