Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:08:31 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
<E66C6492940849F38819FF0A67C49BAC@Data> |
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kevin,
For listening to AM, I agree. In what other ways is it better?
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Nathan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 21:10
Subject: Re: RX difference between TS-480 and TS-2000?
> Hi Steve,
>
> I've used both and I think the 480 is the better receiver.
>
> Very 73..
>
>
>
> Kevin :)
> Amateur Radio: K7RX
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 10:21, steve <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Just wondering if anyone has done a side by side comparison of the
>> TS-2000
>> and the TS-480 on receive? I would like to get another HF rig in the
>> shack.
>> I'm willing to sacrifice some performance in favor of accessibility
>> inherent
>> with Kenwood, since I have no sighted help here. Rumors still
>> abound of
>> Kenwood debuting a new HF rig at Dayton in May, but even if true,
>> not sure
>> I would want to be the first in line for a new model.
>>
>> I know the 480 requires optional filters, but is the 480 a noticeable
>> improvement on rx?
>>
>> 73, Steve KW3A
>
>
|
|
|