BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Nov 2010 13:43:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
That's a very good question but you can bet it will be a while before you 
see it again.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: ft-897d


> then why does the FT450 have some onboard speech output if they don't care
> to?
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 6:24 AM
> Subject: Re: ft-897d
>
>
>> They've made it known they flat out don't care to.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 6:01 AM
>> Subject: Re: ft-897d
>>
>>
>>> So what the hell good does a well built radio do us if it is not
>>> accessible
>>> to us?  Couldn't Yaesu build just as good a radio with accessible
>>> features
>>> for the Blind?
>>> Harvey 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2