Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Was: Zero Carb, Now Fructose
From:
Padraig Hogan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Jul 2009 23:25:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (142 lines)
>>>Wild men are savages, savages hunt for meat... tribes hunt for meat...
>>clearly ...
>
>> My point was that it was that sort of thinking that helped propagate the
>idea of "Man the Hunter". 
>
>I can put your mind at ease on that one. The thinking that helped propagate
>hunting is millions of years old and predates our species of H. s. sapiens.
>All cultures that existed before 10,000-20,000 years ago had hunting as a
>key element of that culture and in all cases of hunting and gathering
>cultures studied so far, hunting is seen as sacred, not "savage." It is
>modern agrarian and industrial white men who most commonly view hunting as
>"savage." 
>
>Hunting comes from nature and is found in all ancient indigenous cultures.
>Anti-hunting comes from those newer agrarian societies that have a tendency
>toward ethnocentrism, colonialism, and imperialism and think that there is
>only one right way to live. These powers have forced totalitarian
>agriculture on nearly all the indigenous peoples and nearly wiped them all
>out in the process. 
>

I do agree with the totalitarian agriculture aspect of it. I view modern foods as 
drugs, plain and simple. Them and their effects aren't much different to hard 
drugs. 

>Vegetarianism and fruitarianism are even newer concepts that some modern 
men
>have been trying to force on indigenous peoples and indeed all people. These
>books will help put you further at ease regarding this and dispel the
>misguided notions of the overlords of Taker societies on these issues:
>

Uh oh... spaghettio. Seems like we're demeaning and degrading others' diet 
choices again. You were doing so well for a long time there....

>Ishmael by Daniel Quinn
>The Ways of My Grandmothers by Beverly Hungry Wolf
>Vilhjalmur Stefansson
>The Tender Carnivore and the Sacred Game by Paul Shepard
>Limited Wants, Unlimited Means: A Reader on Hunter Gatherer Economics and
>the Environment, edited by John Gowdy
>Tribe by Bruce Parry
>The Power of Myth by Joseph Campbell with Bill Moyers 
>Guns, Germs and Steel by Jared Diamond
>Stone Age Economics by Marshall Sahlins
>"Progress Kills" by Survival International (Survival International defends
>the rights, including the hunting rights, of indigenous Leaver peoples in
>the face of oppression from modern agrarian Taker societies)
>Perpetuating Hunter Tradition: Redefining Hunting In Terms Of Its Positive
>Influence On Youth, Society and The Environment by Randall L. Eaton, Ph.D.
>
>..and there are others.
>
>Relocating us will be meaningless if we do not have land to hunt on. - Peter
>Penashue, Innu, Canada
>
>> Maybe it's because of the dogma that seems to be floating around here 
and 
>> the net in general that the Paleo Diet consisted of a very high amount of
>meat 
>> protein. 
>
>Some people are dogmatic about it, yes, which is true in any dietary
>category. The worst fanaticism I have seen and experienced is from strict
>vegetarians & vegans, though that doesn't excuse it in any corner. You'll
>find some people in this forum who eat foods that aren't normally considered
>Paleo, such as dairy products. So people are generally fairly tolerant here.
>If anyone told you that this was a dogmatic or intolerant forum, they misled
>you. Some people strongly disagreed with my consumption of flax seed oil,
>perhaps in an overly negative way, but they didn't insult me or banish me
>and I used it as a motivator to question my assumptions and look further
>into the topic. If you have specific examples of dogma you see here by all
>means point them out.
>

I've taken seeds occasionally, including flax seeds. They're nice and meant to 
be good for you. The only thing is their nutrition to calorie ratio seems a bit 
low. 

>I personally don't see a necessity to eat a very high amount of
>meat--requirements to eat only one type of food tend to come from modern
>people who base their nutrition on religious or philosophical dogmas from
>the last 2000 years, such as those behind some of vegetarianism/veganism.
>Most people here who eat a flesh-based diet came to it, like me, after
>trying other alternatives. Some people, such as the traditional !Kung San,
>seem to do well eating a sizable amount of nuts and other plant foods in
>addition to meats (though even they eat less carbs and more omega-3 fats
>than most Westerners). I hope you will also acknowledge that some people,
>such as the traditional Inuit, Plains Indians, Nenet and Yeniseians of
>Siberia, Enawene Nawe of Brazil, myself and others here, do very well indeed
>on a meat/fat/organ- or fish/seafood-based diet and that hunting/fishing is
>sacred to the remaining traditional indigenous peoples of the world who have
>not already been exterminated or subjugated and to people like me who hunt
>or fish to live healthfully and as natural/spiritual participation in the
>sacred wheel of life, not purely for sport or entertainment. I would defend
>your right to eat a fruit-based diet and I hope you would defend my right to
>eat a flesh-based diet, as sustainably as we both can, for there is no one
>precise right way to live.
>

Who knows, maybe we are also designed to eat a high protein diet. Maybe the 
ratio of carbs/proteins/oil makes almost no difference. Are you aware of the 
largest study of dietary habits done of all time, The China Study? They found 
that plant-based was far better than protein-based diets. Personally I'd feel 
*far* safer with a high carbohydrate diet than high protein one. 

>Have you even tried a diet based on a raw or lightly- or slow-cooked
>pasture-fed meat/fat/organs or wild seafood for a few weeks? If not, how do
>you know how you would do on it? Stephen Covey had good advice on
>this--"Seek first to understand, then to be understood."
>

I have for a few days, but I'm not doing that to myself for a few weeks... 
good luck with trying to keep an alkaline body btw. 

>By the way, you might be interested to learn something I've learned in my
>own investigations of my Irish heritage. Via DNA tracking, most of the Irish
>have been found to be descended from ancient Siberian hunter-gatherer
>peoples. The "Kets" Yeniseian peoples of Siberia retain the greatest
>concentration of genetic material from those ancient peoples and until the
>Soviets subjugated them in the 20th century were still living a
>hunter-gatherer lifestyle. So studying the Kets of the early 20th century
>gives a glimpse into the way of life of the ancestors of the Irish. As with
>the Kets, hunting was sacred to the ancient Irish hunter gatherers and
>pastoralists.
>
>Your questions and comments have helped me organize some of my own 
thoughts.
>Thanks for that!
>
>Swiyohake'! / Tókhi wániphika ní! / Go n-éirí an t-ádh leat! / Good luck!

I'm also Irish!!! Well, Irish people surprisingly have the highest amount of blue-
eyed people in the world, I have light blue eyes. Blue-eyed people have been 
scientifically shown to be far more introverted, thoughtful (it doesn't have to 
mean great memory or fast-talking) and more gentle (rather than more 
vigorous and cutthroat but there's nothing wrong with that at all in the right 
circumstances). So I really doubt I'm evolved for a high-protein diet, as I'm 
also introverted, not cut-throat and wouldn't go out hunting. I have no desire 
or need for it. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with it, but as for me? No.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV