BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerry Leary <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 05:59:53 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (111 lines)
If you have a LDG TW1 talking watt meter, you can do like I do, and that is 
I use an old heath kit Tuner and do it manually.  It is easy and fun.  It 
reminds me of the old Viking 2 days.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: auto antenna tuner


> John,
>
> Do they have an interface for the TS2000?
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:40
> Subject: Re: auto antenna tuner
>
>
>> The LDG tuners you can get an interface for and have for a long time, so
>> you
>> can hook it to the radio and use the tune button and it will drop the
>> power
>> and all.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:10 AM
>> Subject: Re: auto antenna tuner
>>
>>
>>> Steve,
>>>
>>> Well I did take a deep breath before ordering.   While I have never had
>>> a lot of MFJ stuff, the stuff I've had over the years has all worked
>>> fine.   I know others haven't been so lucky, but I've had this one over
>>> 2 years with  no problems.
>>>
>>> I can't compare to the LDG since I've never owned one.   At the time of
>>> purchase I did compare the specs for both.   The LDG had 6 meter
>>> coverage, but I work very little 6M and no amp, so no big deal.   The
>>> MFJ offered higher power (1.5K vs. 1K)  as well as the ability to
>>> automatically lower rf drive and change to cw for tuning, while the LDG
>>> required you to do all that manually.   The MFJ also had the amp relay
>>> connections.   Of course LDG may have  something out today with more
>>> features.
>>>
>>> Truth is, I've switched the MFJ and the Palstar manual tuner in  and out
>>> of the system a number of times over the past 2 years.   Each has it's
>>> benefits.   I would have loved a Palstar auto tuner, but too rich for
>>> me.    The Palstar auto had a motor driven roller inductor and either 1
>>> or 2 moter driven caps.    It just went out of production, but a new one
>>> is coming soon, although I've not seen any specs on it.
>>>
>>> 73, Steve KW3A
>>>
>>> On 9/17/2010 10:25 AM, Steve Dresser wrote:
>>>> Steve,
>>>>
>>>> How do you think your MFJ auto-tuner stacks up against LDG's AT-1000?
>>>> I'm
>>>> sure the MFJ is cheaper, but based on things I've heard about other MFJ
>>>> tuners, I wonder how reliable the internal components are.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Steve Forst"<[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To:<[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 10:05
>>>> Subject: Re: auto antenna tuner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Butch,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a MFJ-998 in the shack.  I'd give it a 4 out of 5 rating.   It
>>>>> will handle 1500 watts, which is more then  my AL-80B or THP solid
>>>>> state
>>>>> amp will put out.  The problem I think you will find with  auto tuners
>>>>> including the ones built into the radio is limited matching range due
>>>>> to
>>>>> the fixed values of L and C. You won't be able to load your
>>>>> grandmother's walker on 40 meters.
>>>>> It has a ton of memories and up and down L and C buttons so you can
>>>>> find
>>>>> a match manually if the auto function can't.   An optional 20$ cable
>>>>> will interface to many rigs, and when connected this way hitting the
>>>>> auto tune button on the rig bypasses the internal tuner, puts the rig
>>>>> into cw mode at low power for the tune  process, then returns to
>>>>> original mode and   power when tuning is complete.  If the amp relay
>>>>> jacks on the tuner are connected between the amp and radio,  the amp
>>>>> will be bypassed during tune up.   This relay is also supposed to
>>>>> prevent the amp from keying in the event of a high swr, but I can't 
>>>>> say
>>>>> that I've really  tested this function fully.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are some menus for which sighted help would be needed, but they
>>>>> are the set it and forget it type of stuff.   Things like swr point at
>>>>> which it should  start looking for a better match, and swr point for
>>>>> the
>>>>> amp relay to bypass the amp.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, Steve KW3A
>>>>>
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2