BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:47:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Ed,

If you're looking for accessibility, you can't beat the 480.  I have both 
the 480 and the 2000, and if the 480 is a 9 on a scale of 1 to 10 for 
accessibility, the 2000 is about a 7.  Re: selectivity, the 2000 wins hands 
down because of the IF DSP, especially on SSB.  Re: sensitivity, I think the 
two radios are fairly comparable, but I've never compared them head to head.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 14:44
Subject: T S 2000


>I was wondering how satisfied owners are with this rig along side of others
> they have used?  Selectivity, sensitivity and such,   I hear the
> accessibility is good.
> I have a 480 so am somewhat familiar with this particular  rig.  Thanks 
> and
> 73.  Ed  K7UC
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2