PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Date:
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:10:09 -0500
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jim Swayze <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
<001501cb113c$489dc440$d9d94cc0$@com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>
> Michelle: What were your results the last time? Will you have a  
> comparative data?
>

I will try to do a comparison, Michelle, with the previous  
experiment.  Last time my focus was on how this Rosedale plan  
affected athletic performance.  I found that I had decreased levels  
of energy for the first few days followed by an increase and then  
leveling.  My workouts are single set to exhaustion, twice a week. My  
athletic performance improved dramatically and at one point, as a  
test, I ran nine miles around White Rock Lake here in Dallas without  
any running training.  I had tiredness the next few days afterwards,  
but zero soreness.  The weight I lost certainly helped, but there is  
something more.

My focus this time is to try to get as much fat as I can.  Last time,  
I did without and ended up not consuming many calories a day -- I  
think I averaged 1300 a day for the first ten days or so.  I think  
more fat would have allowed me more energy earlier...

Jim

ATOM RSS1 RSS2