Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:10:09 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<001501cb113c$489dc440$d9d94cc0$@com> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>
> Michelle: What were your results the last time? Will you have a
> comparative data?
>
I will try to do a comparison, Michelle, with the previous
experiment. Last time my focus was on how this Rosedale plan
affected athletic performance. I found that I had decreased levels
of energy for the first few days followed by an increase and then
leveling. My workouts are single set to exhaustion, twice a week. My
athletic performance improved dramatically and at one point, as a
test, I ran nine miles around White Rock Lake here in Dallas without
any running training. I had tiredness the next few days afterwards,
but zero soreness. The weight I lost certainly helped, but there is
something more.
My focus this time is to try to get as much fat as I can. Last time,
I did without and ended up not consuming many calories a day -- I
think I averaged 1300 a day for the first ten days or so. I think
more fat would have allowed me more energy earlier...
Jim
|
|
|