Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 8 Sep 2010 23:39:41 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
192.168.1.1 for linksys and most routers, 192.168.0.1 for d-link
----- Original Message -----
From: "David R. Basden" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: Wireless router
>I can support LinkSys as well. I have had several and they are all
> accessible if you program them directly by hooking them to your
> ethernet port and using your internet browser to connect to
> 192.168.0.1 I think it is or maybe it's 192.168.1.1
>
> Dave
>
>
> At 06:33 PM 9/8/2010, you wrote:
>>IMO you can't go wrong with the Linksys ones like the WRT54G/GL/GS. =
>>Sorry, don't know about the ones that do 802.11N. But I have two Asus =
>>WL-520GU routers; have set up two others. They're great with dd-wrt =
>>flashed onto them, very accessible, and (best of all) cheap.=20
>>--
>>Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
>>Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY
>>
>>
>>
>>On Sep 8, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Fred Adams wrote:
>>
>> > Could some of you guys suggest the best wireless computer router that
>> > =
>>you=20
>> > think is best? Are wireless routers hard to program and does ham =
>>radio RF=20
>> > get into computers any easier with wireless routers? I would =
>>appreciate any=20
>> > info or suggestions on this as I am thinking of changing from a cable =
>>router=20
>> > to a wireless router.
>> >=20
>> >=20
>> >=20
>> > Best wishes,
>> >=20
>> >=20
>> > FRED C. ADAMS W4HC
>> > THE HOUR IS LATE AND
>> > THE NIGHT IS FAR SPENT
>> > VOTE IN NOVEMBER=20
|
|
|