Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 30 May 2010 03:19:49 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
if it's so huge, and has these motives, why aren't more radios accessible?
the NFB has huge advocacy and influential power as an organization when it
wants to.
at any rate, I agree that any push forward with requests to wouxun for more
speech should be from consumers and not disability advocate organizations.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sarah Alawami" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2010 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Wouxun Radio's, Thoughts
> That's whre I disagree. The ham thng in the convention is hudge and all =
> of us agree that all rados should be made accessibal to a point. I don't =
> want everythig spoken as that would drive me nuts but at least the freq =
> and menues and mode spoken.
>
> Take care all.
> On May 29, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Eric Clegg wrote:
>
>> Hi Maurice,
>> I agree that a set of specifications viz a vis accessibility would =
> have to=20
>> be worked out.
>>=20
>> I also feel that both groups the ACB anf NFB could get together to =
> hash out=20
>> what needs to be done.
>>=20
>> I have noticed on both groups lists particularly the amateur radio =
> lists=20
>> politeness and cooperativeness rules.
>>=20
>> Oh by the way will you be coming to the Braille Research In the =
> Rockies=20
>> conference in Denver the weekend of June 10 thru 12, 2010.
>>=20
>> Can you recommend any repeaters in Denver I might try?
>>=20
>> 73,
>>=20
>> Eric Clegg
>> KU3I
>>=20
>>=20
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus =
> signature database 5154 (20100528) __________
>>=20
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>=20
>> http://www.eset.com
|
|
|