I agree completly.


Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 3, 2010, at 3:03 PM, John Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I just haven't seen anything from yaesu in years from the quality  
> control,
> to performance, to accessibility, to design of anything that makes  
> me want
> one, interested, or willing to go through the aggravation
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Ryan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2010 2:15 PM
> Subject: Re_PS Question
>
>
>> Hi John:=20
>>
>> Why does the PS-53 Yaesu combo give you a horrible feeling? (LOL)=20
>> I think Yaesu products are equal to those of Icomm and any other of  
>> the =
>> modern stuff available. Of course, the 2 best receivers I've ever  
>> heard =
>> were a Yaesu FT-102, which I made my vary first HF contact on and  
>> my old =
>> TS-940SAT.=20
>> I don't think my new rig is going to come close by far to either  
>> but it =
>> should be better than the 570. Just an opinion! LOL=20
>> =20
>>
>> 73:=20
>>
>> Mike=20
>> P S=20
>>
>> Best bang for the buck ratio was certainly another deciding factor  
>> and =
>> the eham reviews show that.=20
>> .=20