BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Kenwood TS-480 more accessible than TS-2000?
From:
"David R. Basden" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 31 May 2010 08:11:04 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
 From what I can gather about the TS2000, the essentials talk, but at 
least some of the menus require you to use the manual and count 
clicks.  The TS480 announces menu selections.  There is little or no 
need for work arounds on the TS480.  As for nonaccessibility issues, 
that's a matter of personal preference in the sound of the audio and 
the like.  I'm quite satisfied with my TS480.

73,

Dave, W7OQ


At 05:01 AM 5/31/2010, you wrote:
>Hi,
>I am still thinking about the TS-2000 since I also want to have 2m and 70cm=
>  and the TS-480 only features shortwave and 50 MHz.
>But someone told me that it was more accessible, is this really true?
>Many thanks,
>Christian

ATOM RSS1 RSS2