TS-2000 fits my needs, especially where I very very rarely use 2 meters and 
440, it's nice to have for that once in a while but I don't like those bands 
very much so a separate radio at this point would be a waste of room, and 
money. I have a couple others around but one will end up mobile and not sure 
on anything else.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: Kenwood TS-480 more accessible than TS-2000?


> Let's not get caught up with accessibility.
> Let's use the radio and see if it meets our specifications and worry
> about the small stuff later.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 31, 2010, at 8:41 AM, John Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Personally I think the TS-2000 talks too much with the speech board
>> in it,
>> if the 480 does more than that it would go out the window if I had
>> one.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christian" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 8:01 AM
>> Subject: Kenwood TS-480 more accessible than TS-2000?
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I am still thinking about the TS-2000 since I also want to have 2m
>>> and
>>> 70cm=
>>> and the TS-480 only features shortwave and 50 MHz.
>>> But someone told me that it was more accessible, is this really true?
>>> Many thanks,
>>> Christian