BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date:
Mon, 31 May 2010 14:01:23 +0200
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Kenwood TS-480 more accessible than TS-2000?
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 lines) 
Hi,
I am still thinking about the TS-2000 since I also want to have 2m and 70cm and the TS-480 only features shortwave and 50 MHz.
But someone told me that it was more accessible, is this really true?
Many thanks,
Christian

ATOM RSS1 RSS2