Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:45:01 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tom,
You're absolutely right on with your comments. And, your term
"workaround" really tells it like it is.
Don w6smb
On 9/17/2010 1:19 PM, Tom Brennan wrote:
> Martin, you entirely missed my point. As it happens, I am not a windoze user
> but that's not the point at all. My point is what people are calling
> "accessibility" is not accessibility but rather a work around. If it requires a
> separate computer for me to operate my radio or any other piece of equipment
> that is not accessibility of the equipment. It is only accessability of the
> software and the basic equipment still remains inaccessible. Personally I want
> to be able to use a product without being tied to my computer in order to do it.
> Otherwise, you can do nothing if your computer goes down and everything becomes
> inaccessible. Its a little like going to somewhere where the computerized cash
> register is down and the people on duty are not capable of making change by
> hand.
>
> Tom
>
>
> Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>
> __________ NOD32 5458 (20100917) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
|
|
|