BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sarah Alawami <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 29 May 2010 16:06:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
That's whre I disagree. The ham thng in the convention is hudge and all of us agree that all rados should be made accessibal to a point. I don't want everythig spoken as that would drive me nuts but at least the freq and menues and mode spoken.

Take care all.
On May 29, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Eric Clegg wrote:

> Hi Maurice,
> I agree that a set of specifications viz a vis accessibility would have to 
> be worked out.
> 
> I also feel that both groups the ACB anf NFB could get together to hash out 
> what needs to be done.
> 
> I have noticed on both groups lists particularly the amateur radio lists 
> politeness and cooperativeness rules.
> 
> Oh by the way will you be coming to the Braille Research In the Rockies 
> conference in Denver the weekend of June 10 thru 12, 2010.
> 
> Can you recommend any repeaters in Denver I might try?
> 
> 73,
> 
> Eric Clegg
> KU3I
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5154 (20100528) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2